Payroll works, mostly. But attendance still gets reconciled by hand, your shift or piece-rate structure doesn't fit the product's model, and every month someone spends days producing numbers instead of checking them.
STAY WITH GREYTHR, KEKA AND DARWINBOX IF
CONSIDER BUILDING IF
| greytHR, Keka and Darwinbox | Custom build with Ekalon | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost shape | Per employee per month, scales with headcount | One-time build plus flat support |
| Statutory compliance | Maintained by the vendor, updated automatically | Built and maintained for the regulations that apply to you |
| Attendance and shifts | Standard models; unusual structures need workarounds | Modelled exactly as you run it, including piece rate and contract labour |
| Integration with your ERP | Via available APIs, where they exist | Same system, or a direct integration built for it |
| Time to live | Weeks | Six to twelve weeks including parallel payroll runs |
| Switching risk | Low to start, higher once you depend on it | De-risked by running both systems in parallel until numbers match |
Comparison reflects typical engagements as of 2026 and is our own assessment, not the vendor's. Product capabilities change — check current details with greytHR, Keka and Darwinbox before deciding.
Tell us what you run today and roughly what it costs you. We'll say honestly whether to stay, integrate, or build — before you spend a rupee with us.